Relativity??????

There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.|||I don't think it ultimatly matters if there's only a hundred billion stars in the galaxy, because there's an infinite amount of galaxies in the universe, and there's still tons of space we have yet to discover. I guess our galaxy would have economic numbers, while the rest of the universe has astronomical numbers, relatively speaking.|||That sounds like something Ellen Degeneres would say, even though it's Richard Feynman that's the author.|||This has nothing to do with philosophy but rather more suitable with science and mathematics or maybe economics.|||That galaxy covers less than a trillionth of the available space.Its been calculated that the number of probable planets in the universe is as many as ten billion trillion(Carl Sagen)thats quite astronomical|||Like good old Albert said: "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts".





Good luck!|||that display meaning of evolution, humanity itself does not produce abundance but debt..Still precise numbers or simply numbers it is only guessing of humanity as a whole, another attempt to limit universe according to image and likeness of human (humanity). Including smartest ones.|||thers not just one galaxy.there r otheres with miooins of stars in it.